Thursday, February 25, 2016

Catholic Guilt and Autism: A Parable of Consequence

Catholic Guilt and Autism:  A Parable of Consequence

2/25/2015
Last night was Trason’s First Confession.  We decided to risk it all and bring the whole family.  It was not without consequence. 
We were careful with Liam.  Anything having to do with Church in the evening is always a dangerous venture with Liam.  Although he has learned not to stim or rock in Church, he can still surprise us if he is tired, lying down on the pew or declaring his boredom loudly.  After a long day at school, homework and general tiredness, Liam will usually express his frustration with a long-winded homily by blurting out some unexpected thought loudly and at the most inappropriate time.  I call Liam's unfiltered thought expressions a generous distribution of humility from God.
We managed to get through the First Reconciliation service without too many disruptions from Liam.  There was a reading from the New Testament, a reading from the Gospel, two songs and a brief homily by the pastor.  Liam weathered it all in quiet.  I was so proud of my big guy.  He was really beginning to demonstrate some real, big-brother-behavior forTrason.  Trason often spars with Liam for fun,  Tonight, he was the biggest squirm-bot.  Seven o’clock in the evening on a Wednesday is a struggle for him too.  Plus, the poor kid was nervous, so a little relief from Liam would have been a welcome treat.  No such luck tonight.  Liam was stellar.
It was nearing the end of the ceremony.  It was time to kneel for the Examination of Conscience.  This part of the service was critical for the little penitents to review their behavior, consider their intentions, weigh the guilt buried within their little souls and recognize their sorrow for infractions that may (or may not) be sinful.  It is the cornerstone of good, old-fashioned, Catholic guilt.  It is a necessary component in the process to help the little ones identify consequences in their behavior.  Guilt (from committing a sin) can be helpful in recognizing the negative risks involved in future behavior, so it serves a vital function.  In the Sacrament of Reconciliation, it is needed for the process to move from recognition of sin to remorse and seeking forgiveness.  Without guilt, we may never feel the need to ask for forgiveness.  Too much guilt can lead to despair.  It is a delicate yet fundamental task to achieve as a catechist and one we all know can result in pushing away a penitent as adults.
Life circumstances are the reason for this problem.  If a child is abused or made to feel they are not worthy of love a parent's love, guilt acts as a pile of rocks on their chest, preventing them from simply breathing.  I can spot these kids a mile away.  The boys are aggressive and lash out in anger at the smallest things. The girls cry a lot; a WHOLE lot.  They struggle with finding any self-worth and despair often fills their tiny hearts.  I know.  I was one of these little girls.
The guilt from saying the wrong thing, which I often did, led my mother to rant for hours, telling me how stupid I was.  A molehill was often made into a mountain.  One time, in my adolescence, she actually said she didn’t know why I bothered even going to church, I was such a lousy Christian.  That was the lowest point.  It wasn’t long after that incident I became suicidal and sought help. 
When guilt is liberally dispensed by a parent, either in word or action, it communicates to a child that there is little hope for them.  Despair is the product of unrelenting guilt left unchecked.  It can create a sense of worthlessness that only God can fix.  In the adult mind, we will reject guilt at some point in an effort to protect our fragile self-concept.  However, children rarely have the skills necessary to insulate their developing self-concepts in that manner.  They internalize it to the point where even the most extreme, unreasonable accusation of wrongdoing or blame is accepted.  It becomes part of their core personality, a catalyst for struggle in years to come.
So when the examination of conscience began, I hadn’t really considered who was doing it.  It was a priest who had been a missionary in a very poverty stricken area of the world.  He has seen severe deprivation and knows how much ungrateful Americans truly have.  His disgust with us sometimes comes across in his homilies.  He has a way of delivering guilt in a manner that can make a grown man cry.  He is sometimes angry sounding and his preaching has been described as judgmental.  The tone of delivery can change everything in how a person hears something, and it never crossed my mind what tone I was hearing from this particular priest when he spoke.  It just took me back to the days when my mother ranted at me for not mopping the floor well enough or leaving a school book on her kitchen counter. 
The litany for the examination of conscience began.  Did I hit my brother or sister?  Was I good in church, or did I disturb others and make noise at Mass?  This one caused me to be triggered.  I have often felt guilty for the noises, sniffs, snorts and bodily expulsions of gas that Liam lets out in church.  I am not laying blame on Liam.  I just know how I felt the actions of my son were my fault.  I wasn’t alone.
When Father got to the question, “Did you do your best in school?” Liam burst out a defensive “YES!”  Liam tries so hard in school, often without the results the teachers expect, so he knows how it feels to take responsibility for something he cannot control.  The other children giggled.  I giggled too, thankful for the relief from guilt.  Little did I know, Liam started a trend with the other kids.  Every question asked by Father was given resounding responses of “YES!” or “NO!” from the other kids, in unison.  Father grew frustrated, thwarted from dispensing the required amount of guilt upon his little penitents.  No matter how much judgmental tone he used, he could not sway the kids from responding from the rhetorical queries.  By the time he finished, he looked defeated, beaten down by a kid with autism and a bunch of second grade kids.
Whenever Liam does anything, I usually discover it comes with a message from God.  Today was no different.  The message delivery was assisted by the other children after Liam started the response litany.  The message was meant for all those who are plagued by unrelenting and undeserved guilt.  It was also meant for all those who stand in judgment of others, just like Father.  Whether we are right in our judgment or not, we act as the older brother in the Prodigal Son parable, expecting harsh action from a Loving Father who simply wants to embrace us, love us and rejoice at our return. 
The consequence of our actions, intentional or not, continue to exist.  We still have to face poor grades in school, whether from a lack of capacity or a lack of effort.  I still confront the dread of seeing all those people who sit behind my son when he passes gas at Mass. God doesn’t wave a magic wand and remove the effects of our sin on our life circumstances.  However,  God does want us to know that He loves us and forgives us. 

God won’t give us the skunk eye for our kids, which may be a good lesson for the little ladies with bluish white hair.  God won't impose guilt after we have said we are sorry for what we have done.  We do that.  Perhaps God was generously distributing the gift of humility on Father today.  Judging by his expression as he walked away from the lectern, it was definitely a lesson in something!

Thursday, February 4, 2016

Why women will never dominate the field of philosophy

I spent the better part of today improving that part of my dissertation which was lacking. Namely, it was in the philosophical theory component of my approach.  I hate philosophy.

It isn't that I dislike the process.  I just don't understand the why.  Why is it that men will consume a vast amount of resources and time to contemplate the word being or other?  If you want to understand the meaning of existence, ask a woman.  She can tell you easily:  The meaning of being is the ability to love, even when the world is falling apart before your very eyes and you want to crawl under a rock to hide.

If you ever go shopping at a grocery store, look for a young mother with a newborn.  That is the epitome of existence-meaning.  She is there, looking to find food to feed her family, probably sleep deprived, while struggling to keep a young baby from going ballistic while the other customers shudder from the shrieking.  Autism moms know that feeling too.  The shrieking is the inevitable result of our special kids meeting a point in their existence that is in-congruent with their sensory tolerance level.  The struggle is real.  Reality is this.  To consider it, one need only watch an autism mom for ten minutes.  Meaning in existence is found in those around you, and how much they need you, despite your desire to disappear.

Struggling to share God's Love with a child who operates from a place of anxiety in crowds is another way to contemplate meaning in existence.  Take a child with autism to Mass and you will soon learn that the conflict between worshiping your Creator and keeping your child from screeching at Mass (because he wants to play with his iPad in Church but you said, "no") is rife with tension.   Being takes a secondary place to surviving the moment.   Having all eyes upon you as you wrestle your child to the vestibule so the priest can continue the Mass is the very moment of being autism moms like me would rather not know.  Being may be important to Martin, but to a mother with a six foot, 300 pound 13 year old having a tantrum because he has to kneel like everyone else in the church, it seems not as important unless it also involves a method of disappearing.  Believe me when I say, had Heidegger said, "The necessity of the explicit retrieve of the question of being" to my face, I would have told him to find a hobby.  Some of us do not need to "retrieve" the question.  It is thrown at us on a continuous basis.

No offense, Martin.  I get that guys can't give birth, so they ponder the questions of the universe in order to leave behind proof of their existence on this earth.  Don't get me wrong.  I am glad they have the time to do it.  The accolades and praise they receive from the Mutual Admiration Society should be enough to reward their efforts.  However, while you are there, pondering these questions of meaning, the world will fall apart for me here.  The luxury of pondering these things is surely the domain of men with lots of time on their hands, not mothers of kids with special needs. With all due respect, I will catch a living hell if I were to do what you did!

Which leads me to my point.  What does Heidegger's Hermeneutics have to do with families struggling with daily life, or autism, or a combination of the two?  According to a friend of mine, it will help me justify to my committee why and how I need to present my study.  Fine.  I will grapple with these concepts for the next 24 hours in order to put it in my literature review, thereby, sounding as though I actually understand where Martin was coming from.  I'm not sure I do.

The truth is, it is light years from my world.  Do I really need to explain Martin's understanding of Being to comprehend what it is like to hold your breath as your child walks five feet from you in church and begins to tear down his pants because he is uncomfortable with wearing his new church clothes?  Do I need to define the original Greek term of hermeneutics, in order to completely appreciate the existential crisis that comes from hearing your five year old son go into meltdown mode during the Consecration?  More importantly, can pondering the concept of Dasein help anyone know that stomach dropping, heart pounding feeling as your child rushes out of the church straight for the parking lot when you let go of his hand to dip your fingers into the holy water to bless yourself, praying for the strength to get through another week without a breakdown?

The short answer is no.  However, it might help me meet the committee where they are, in order to show them where we are.